As it was decided during the first meeting in Klaipeda - the leaders of this „workpackage“ Irena (KU CSI) and Iveta (Olomouc University) were appointed to create a tool for investigation - a questionnaire. The ideas for this questionnaire were also proposed by Elmo and they were based on the experience of the previous EMCET and TACCLE projects.
Iveta sent us a version of the questionnaire which is designed to find out the methods that teachers are using and also lacking in their work (Iveta‘s questionnaire).
In the meetings that Irena organized in our Andragogy department there were discussions that there should be a questionnaire shape allowing us to find out about the particular methods we are considering in our DETVET project.
We also believe that the partner offering a particular technique or approach should find out the questions or statements which are to be put in the questionnaire. We are attaching a scheme of this tool (CSI questionnaire) together with the statements allowing to reveal our – andragogic – part of teachers competences or skills. That could be an example how all the partners could fill in their parts, too, by formulating 5-6 statements. In any case – if you have any other and better idea – please let us know about that!
Could we expect each partner's contribution until December 7th?
Iveta sent us a version of the questionnaire which is designed to find out the methods that teachers are using and also lacking in their work (Iveta‘s questionnaire).
In the meetings that Irena organized in our Andragogy department there were discussions that there should be a questionnaire shape allowing us to find out about the particular methods we are considering in our DETVET project.
We also believe that the partner offering a particular technique or approach should find out the questions or statements which are to be put in the questionnaire. We are attaching a scheme of this tool (CSI questionnaire) together with the statements allowing to reveal our – andragogic – part of teachers competences or skills. That could be an example how all the partners could fill in their parts, too, by formulating 5-6 statements. In any case – if you have any other and better idea – please let us know about that!
Could we expect each partner's contribution until December 7th?
Alina,
ReplyDeleteit is not clear if we should consider and apply both questionnaires or only CSI questionnaire. In alternative, will the two questionnaires be combined?
Here is also a place where the comments from Sisko could be put: definitely, a questionnaire with more open questions is more welcomed as it brings more information about the methods used in the VET teachers community. Plese, express your opinion :)!
ReplyDelete